त्यावेळी मी काही कामानिमित्ताने एका परिचितांकडे गेलो होतो
आमच्या पुण्यात विद्वानांची विचारवंतांची कमी नाही अस म्हणतात
अस म्हणतात पुण्याची जी लोकसंख्या आहे त्याच्या
दीडपट लोक शहाणे (विद्वान\विचारवंत) राहतात ,,,
दुपारचे साधारण १२ वाजले होते आणि समोरचे माझे मित्र
वयाने खूप मोठे आहेत आणि थोडे स्वभावाने हि हेकट
पण गेली ४\५ वर्षे त्यांच्याशी फेसबुकच्या माध्यमातून
ओळख झाली आणि त्यांना माझ्या लोखानावरून आणि नंतर बोलण्यातून
माझा स्वभाव आणि मी त्यांच्या चांगलाच ध्यानात आला
शक्यतो ते बोलताना ते मझी टिंगल उडवल्या शिवाय राहत नाहीत
आणि आतातर मी शंभू राजां बाबत काही लिहितोय
समजल्यावर तर त्यांच्या आधुनिक वारू उधळलाच
मला ते बोलू लागले अहो भूमकर
काय शिवाजी महारज आणि शंभू महाराज आणि
राम आणि कृष्ण,सावरकर ,टिळक ह्यांचा आताच्या कळत उपयोग काय ?
संपूर्ण जग आज एका नव्या दिशेने वाटचाल करतं
नव्या जगाच्या उंबरठ्यावर पाऊल ठेवतय
काय तो ईतिहास
ईतिहास सारख लावलं काही नवीन बोला
आता त्यात काय ठेवलय ?
शिळ्या काढीला कसला नेहमी उत् आणता?
एक मात्र खर माझ नशीब त्यादिवशी जोरावर होत
आमच्या उलट तपासण्या चालू असतानाच
त्यांचा आठवीतला नातू धावत धावत आला आणि त्यांना
म्हणाला आजोबा आजोबा
मी आठवीची परीक्षा पास झालो
मला बेचाळीस टक्के मार्क मिळाले ,,,
आता आजोबांनी खरतर त्याच अभिनंदन करायचं होत
कि वा वा छान छान पास झालास उत्तम
पण तस न होता त्याला ते आजोबा रागवले
गाढवा
पाचवीत तू पहिला आला होतास आता कमी मार्क कसे काय ?
त्या मुलाने काही लक्ष नाही दिले तो निघून गेला
मी त्यांच्या कडे बघून हसलो ते म्हणाले का हसताय ?
मी म्हणालो अहो दादा पाचवीत तो पहिला हा ईतिहास झाला,,,
आता करायचं काय तो जुना ईतिहास उगाळून?
संपूर्ण जग आज एका नव्या दिशेने वाटचाल करतं
नव्या जगाच्या उंबरठ्यावर पाऊल ठेवतय
काय तो ईतिहास
ईतिहास सारख लावलं काही नवीन बोला
आता त्यात काय ठेवलय ?
शिळ्या काढीला कसला नेहमी उत् आणता?
तात्पर्य ---
जो ईतिहास विसरतो तो वर्तमान घडवू शकत नाही
Very Best observation like it . I enjoyed it
ReplyDeleteSaurabh Kelaskar
ReplyDelete26 Jun (5 days ago)
to me
There are nearly 52 Muslim countries.
Show one Muslim country where Hindus are extended the special rights that Muslims are accorded in India?
Show one Muslim country which provides Haj subsidy.
Show one country where the 85% majority craves for the indulgence of the 15% minority.
Show one Muslim country, which has a Non-Muslim as its President or Prime Minister
Show one Mullah or Maulvi who has declared a 'fatwa' against terrorists.
Hindu-majority Maharashtra, Bihar, Kerala, Pondicherry , etc. have in the past elected Muslims as CM’s, …..
Can you ever imagine a Hindu becoming the CM of Muslim - majority J&K?
In 1947, when India was partitioned, the Hindu population in Pakistan was about 24% ….Today it is not even 1%.
In 1947, the Hindu population in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was 30% …. Today it is about 7%.
What happened to the missing Hindus?
Do Hindus have human rights?
In contrast, in India, Muslim population has gone up from 10.4% in 1951 to about 14% today;
…whereas Hindu population has come down from 87.2% in 1951 to 85% in 1991.
Do you still think that Hindus are fundamentalists?
In India today Hindus are 85%. If Hindus are intolerant, how come Masjids and madrasas are thriving?
How come Muslims are offering Namaz on the road?
How come Muslims are proclaiming 5 times a day on loud speakers that there is no God except Allah?
When Hindus gave to Muslims 30% of Bharat for a song, why should
Hindus now beg for their sacred places at Ayodhya, Mathura And Kashi?
Why Gandhiji objected to the decision of the cabinet and insisted that Somnath Temple should be reconstructed out of public fund, not government funds. When in January 1948 he pressurized Nehru and Patel to carry on renovation of the Mosques of Delhi at government expenses?
Why Gandhi supported Khilafat Movement (nothing to do with our freedom movement) and what in turn he got?
If Muslims & Christians are minorities in Maharashtra, UP, Bihar etc., are Hindus not minorities in J&K, Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya etc? Why are Hindus denied minority rights in these states?
When Haj pilgrims are given subsidy, why Hindu pilgrims to Amarnath, Sabarimalai & Kailash Mansarovar are taxed?
When Christian and Muslim schools can teach Bible and Quran,
…. Why Hindus cannot teach Gita or Ramayan in our schools?
Do you admit that Hindus do have problems that need to be recognized? Or do you think that those who call themselves Hindus are themselves The problem?
Why post - Godhra is blown out of proportion, when no-one talks of the
ethnic cleansing of 4 lakh Hindus from Kashmir?
When uniform is made compulsory for school children, why there is no Uniform Civil Code for citizens?
In what way, J&K is different from Maharashtra, TamilNadu or UttarPradesh, to have Article 370?
Abdul Rehman Antuley was made a trustee of the famous Siddhi Vinayak
Temple in Prabhadevi, Mumbai ….Can a Hindu - say Mulayam or Laloo – ever become a trustee of a Masjid or Madrasa?
Dr. Praveen bhai Togadia has been arrested many times on flimsy grounds.
Has the Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid, Delhi, Ahmed Bhukari been arrested for claiming to be an ISI agent and advocating partition of Bharat?
Saurabh Kelaskar
ReplyDelete26 Jun (5 days ago)
to me
And what conclusion shall one draw of this?? Is this really “Secularism”. This deliberated use of “Secularism” by the secularists, these maneuvers of the secularist coupled with “against the motion” work of pseudo secular media has occasioned the outrage in common Hindu. “They do not care for us” , they began to feel because we are not organized as Hindus. Not only is common Hindu is not being given a fair bit of attention, but no one even is ready to see, to pay heed to facts as they see it. And the one who raises this issue for them it is effectively being viewed as “extremist”, “fundamentalists” or “communal.” And despite of all this, if anyone who is reminded of secularism above all is a Hindu. He is the one who is expected to close his eyes and simply obey “secularism” as we see it. “Secularist” play a self-deluding fool by condemning Hindus as “savages” one day and then expecting them to pay heed to their great tradition of “tolerance”.
Secularism also is a foul play. A play with religious Hindu sentiments. As that happened in the case of Amarnath, as that happened in the case Matura, in the case of Kashi and ofcourse in the case of Ayodhya. Everyone who speaks of Babri Structure demolition, speaks in the term of “fall of democracy”, in the terms of “stab to secularism”, completely ignoring the premises that contributed in outrage in the “karsevaks” which then brought down the disputed structure. Completely ignoring the long history behind the Ram Mandir and the disputed structure. Completely ignoring the facts that cried loudly about the existence of Ram Mandir. As the central and state government slept all the way through course of demolition, are suddenly reminded of the importance of “Secularism”. “The mosque will be re-built at the same spot”, such cries echoed all over again. The event gave an opportunity once again to secularist to play their cards. They started caging the organizations like RSS and the Sangh Pariwar. Branded them communal. Arrests of leaders like Advani and various other leaders followed. RSS was banned. Secularist drowned the proofs, the facts, and started the their blame game and once again the culprit in the court was A Hindu. No one however seems to have appreciated the state of “karsevaks” who brought about the demolition. No one seemed to have given a thought, as to what led a congregation into crowd, crowd into mob and thence into pack which brought down the Structure? All that was done was blaming them and finding ways to use this opportunity to the best of the ways suitable for secularists. Once again a pun over the sentiments of a Hindu. All under the name of “secularism”.
Saurabh Kelaskar
ReplyDelete26 Jun (5 days ago)
to me
With time, it became easier for the secularists to establish their business of “power” since all they had to do was to side-line “Hindu interest” . That became the easiest way to establish themselves as “self-less seculars”. So, with time came minority concessions and reservations. Came the article 370, came the “Saccar Commission.” Though nothing substantial was earned from it, they continue with the same zeal. Why in a secular state there are “minority” concessions under the name of “minority appeasement? Is caste system not enough itself that we are now turning to “religious differences”? In what way a Muslim or a Christian is different from a Hindu who is denied of these concessions? And still we go on to call ours as a “Secular State”?
Does this not clearly suggest the “Vote Bank” politics played in most pathetic way possible to be in power? Is this not the “pseudo secular” approach of our government?
Does this not suggest the poor and ill-functioning of our government?
Is this not the high time for our “religious counter- parts” to understand the need of time and raise one voice against this? When Hindus have been middling in other faiths that they have to face this discrimination? And why our government is not thinking beyond the political benefits? They, like us, too live in the same country na? So are not the problems faced by common man there’s too?
This is the Second Grave problem which India is facing of system....